strategy: be in teaching

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in teaching 1.00
be in teaching important 0.97
be important in teaching 0.97
be important teaching 0.97
affect method of teaching 0.86
is learning 0.83
affect classroom instruction 0.83
be important for learning 0.82
be different in education 0.80
be important for teachers 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(objective, affect method of teaching)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(objective, be different in education)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(policy, affect classroom instruction)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(policy, affect classroom instruction)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(objective, be different in education)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(objective, affect method of teaching)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(objective, be different in education)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(policy, affect classroom instruction)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important for teachers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(approach, is learning)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(objective, affect method of teaching)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(objective, be different in education)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(policy, affect classroom instruction)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(approach, be important teaching)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(approach, be important in teaching)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(approach, is learning)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(approach, is learning)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(planning, be important for teachers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(planning, be important for teachers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(strategy, be in teaching)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(strategy, be important for learning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(policy, affect classroom instruction)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(objective, be different in education)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, is learning)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(planning, be important for teachers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(policy, affect classroom instruction)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(objective, be different in education)