approach: be important teaching

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.70
, concept
Weight: 0.66
, matter
Weight: 0.63
, fundamental
Weight: 0.62
Siblings method
Weight: 0.72
, philosophy
Weight: 0.66
, process
Weight: 0.66
, gene therapy
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important teaching 1.00
be important in teaching 1.00
is learning 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(approach, be important teaching)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(method, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(approach, be important teaching)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(approach, be important in teaching)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(approach, be important in teaching)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(approach, is learning)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, is learning)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(approach, is learning)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(approach, is learning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(approach, be important teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)