strategy: be important in teaching

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in teaching important 1.00
be important in teaching 1.00
be important teaching 1.00
be in teaching 0.97
be important for learning 0.87
affect method of teaching 0.86
be important in education 0.85
be important for teachers 0.83
is learning 0.83
be important in curriculum development 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(objective, affect method of teaching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(objective, be important in curriculum development)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(policy, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in education)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(objective, be important in education)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(objective, be important in curriculum development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in teaching)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(objective, be important in curriculum development)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(objective, be important in education)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in education)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important for teachers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(approach, is learning)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(method, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(objective, affect method of teaching)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(objective, be important in curriculum development)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(policy, be important in education)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important teaching)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(approach, be important teaching)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(approach, be important in teaching)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(approach, is learning)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(approach, is learning)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(planning, be important for teachers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(planning, be important for teachers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in teaching)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(strategy, be in teaching)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be in teaching important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(strategy, be important for learning)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important for learning)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(strategy, be important for learning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important for learning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(policy, be important in education)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(objective, be important in education)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(objective, be important in curriculum development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(planning, be important for teachers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(approach, is learning)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(approach, be important teaching)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(method, be important in teaching)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(policy, be important in education)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(objective, affect method of teaching)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(objective, be important in education)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(strategy, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(objective, be important in curriculum development)