tool: be needed for science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed for science 1.00
be used in science 0.92
be important in education 0.77
needed prepare 0.77
be important in research 0.76
do quickly math 0.76
do math 0.76
be like imageoptin necessary 0.76
do quickly difficult math 0.76
is necessary 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be needed for science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mechanism, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be needed for science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(gift, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be needed for science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(method, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be needed for science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(method, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(gift, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mechanism, is necessary)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(gift, is necessary)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, is necessary)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(method, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(calculator, do quickly math)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(calculator, do math)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be used in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tool, be needed for science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mechanism, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tool, be needed for science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(gift, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tool, be needed for science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(method, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tool, be needed for science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(spreadsheet, be used in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be used in science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(calculator, do math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(calculator, do math)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(calculator, do quickly math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(calculator, do quickly math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(tool, be needed for science)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tool, needed prepare)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(tool, needed prepare)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(tool, needed prepare)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tool, needed prepare)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tool, be needed for science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(method, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mechanism, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(gift, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be used in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calculator, do math)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(calculator, do quickly math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(method, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mechanism, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(gift, is necessary)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(tool, be needed for science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)