method: be important in research

Related concepts

Parents	approach Weight: 0.72 , standard Weight: 0.66 , option Weight: 0.65 , tool Weight: 0.61
Siblings	algorithm Weight: 0.69 , extraction Weight: 0.67 , strategy Weight: 0.67 , adhesive tape Weight: 0.66 , spray Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in research	1.00
important for scientists	0.80
be important in computer science	0.78
be needed for science	0.76
be important in business	0.76
be important in engineering	0.76
be in education important	0.76
be necessary in science	0.76
be important in data communication	0.75
be important to business	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(standard, be in education important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(standard, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(standard, be important in data communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(standard, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary in science)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(tool, be needed for science)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(standard, be important in business)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(standard, be important in engineering)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(standard, be in education important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(standard, be in education important)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary in science)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(tool, be needed for science)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in business)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(standard, be in education important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(standard, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(standard, be important in data communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(tool, be needed for science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(standard, be necessary in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(algorithm, be important in computer science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(algorithm, be important in computer science)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(strategy, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(method, be important in research)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(method, important for scientists)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(method, important for scientists)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(method, important for scientists)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(method, important for scientists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Salient(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(method, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(standard, be necessary in science)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(tool, be needed for science)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(standard, be important in data communication)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(standard, be important in business)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(standard, be important in engineering)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(standard, be in education important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(strategy, be important to business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(algorithm, be important in computer science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(tool, be needed for science)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(standard, be necessary in science)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(standard, be important in business)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(standard, be important in data communication)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(standard, be important in engineering)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Typical(method, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(standard, be in education important)