standard: be important in engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in engineering 1.00
be important for members of engineering design team 0.90
be important in science 0.80
be necessary in science 0.77
be important in psychology research 0.76
be important in research 0.76
be important in manufacturing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in manufacturing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in psychology research)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(definition, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(definition, be important in science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(definition, be important in research)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(quality, be important in manufacturing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(quality, be important in manufacturing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(method, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(definition, be important in psychology research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(definition, be important in psychology research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(standard, be important in engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(standard, be important for members of engineering design team)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(standard, be important for members of engineering design team)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for members of engineering design team)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(standard, be necessary in science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for members of engineering design team)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary in science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(standard, be important in engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(quality, be important in manufacturing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(definition, be important in science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(definition, be important in research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(definition, be important in psychology research)