tool: is good band

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good band 1.00
has shape band 0.91
be greatest band of time 0.85
work on new album 0.77
work on album 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(tool, is good band)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tool, has shape band)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tool, has shape band)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tool, has shape band)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, be greatest band of time)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tool, work on new album)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tool, work on new album)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tool, has shape band)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(tool, work on new album)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(tool, work on new album)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tool, be greatest band of time)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tool, be greatest band of time)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tool, be greatest band of time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tool, is good band)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(tool, is good band)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tool, is good band)