toothbrush: be better than manual

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
, household appliance
Weight: 0.57
Siblings disposable razor
Weight: 0.36
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.35
, razor blade
Weight: 0.35
, dental floss
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than manual 1.00
is quicker 0.78
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(electric toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be better than manual)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be better than manual)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(electric toothbrush, be better than manual)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(electric toothbrush, be better than manual)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dental floss, is quicker)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(electric toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, be better than manual)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, be better than manual)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dental floss, is quicker)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dental floss, is quicker)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(toothbrush, be better than manual)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, is quicker)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(toothbrush, is quicker)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(toothbrush, is quicker)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(toothbrush, is quicker)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be better than manual)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toothbrush, be better than manual)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, be better than manual)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dental floss, is quicker)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(electric toothbrush, be better than manual)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(toothbrush, be better than manual)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)