toothpaste: be good for burns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
, paste
Weight: 0.57
, necessity
Weight: 0.56
, liquid
Weight: 0.56
Siblings deodorant
Weight: 0.34
, toothbrush
Weight: 0.34
, detergent
Weight: 0.33
, powdered milk
Weight: 0.33
, dental floss
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for burns 1.00
burn 0.85
burn on spots 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, burn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(deodorant, burn) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(deodorant, burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(toothpaste, be good for burns)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(toothpaste, burn)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(toothpaste, burn)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(toothpaste, burn)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(toothpaste, burn)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(toothpaste, be good for burns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(toothpaste, be good for burns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(toothpaste, be good for burns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(deodorant, burn)