topic: is interesting

Related concepts

Parents	subject Weight: 0.72 , issue Weight: 0.66 , event Weight: 0.62 , method Weight: 0.62
Siblings	dark matter Weight: 0.69 , public speaking Weight: 0.68 , agenda Weight: 0.68 , science fiction Weight: 0.66 , meeting Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is interesting	1.00
be important to gilgamesh	0.78
be important 2063	0.78
be important 21	0.78
is ironic	0.77
is useful	0.76
is scary	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(topic, is interesting)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(method, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(topic, is interesting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(method, is useful)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(agenda, be important 21)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(public speaking, is scary)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(agenda, be important 2063)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(science fiction, is interesting)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(agenda, is useful)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(meeting, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(topic, is interesting)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(method, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(topic, is interesting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(science fiction, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(science fiction, is interesting)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(meeting, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(meeting, is useful)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(agenda, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(agenda, is useful)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(agenda, be important 2063) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(agenda, be important 2063)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

Remarkable(agenda, be important 21) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(agenda, be important 21)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(public speaking, is scary) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(public speaking, is scary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(topic, is interesting)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(topic, is ironic)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(topic, is ironic)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(topic, is ironic)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(topic, is ironic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(topic, is interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(method, is useful)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(science fiction, is interesting)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(meeting, is useful)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(agenda, is useful)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(agenda, be important 21)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(agenda, be important 2063)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(public speaking, is scary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(method, is useful)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(topic, is interesting) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)