tourist: be attracted to cities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents visitor
Weight: 0.60
, other people
Weight: 0.53
, site
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.50
Siblings business people
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.32
, amusement park
Weight: 0.31
, young people
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be attracted to cities 1.00
be attracted to burren 0.85
be attracted to coastal areas 0.82
be attracted to antarctica 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to cities)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tourist, be attracted to cities)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(tourist, be attracted to cities)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to cities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tourist, be attracted to cities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(tourist, be attracted to cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(visitor, be attracted to coastal areas)