tourist: have minimum affect on antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents visitor
Weight: 0.60
, other people
Weight: 0.53
, site
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.50
Siblings business people
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.32
, amusement park
Weight: 0.31
, young people
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have minimum affect on antarctica 1.00
affect environment in antarctica 0.79
have impact on antarctica 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tourist, have impact on antarctica)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(tourist, have impact on antarctica)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tourist, have impact on antarctica)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(tourist, affect environment in antarctica)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tourist, have impact on antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tourist, have minimum affect on antarctica)