towel: be at hotel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents paper towel
Weight: 0.71
, piece
Weight: 0.60
, bag
Weight: 0.58
, object
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings beach towel
Weight: 0.79
, washcloth
Weight: 0.46
, towel bar
Weight: 0.36
, towel rack
Weight: 0.36
, toilet paper
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hotel 1.00
be at motel 0.84
be at fast-food restaurant 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(towel, be at hotel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(towel, be at hotel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(towel, be at hotel)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(towel, be at hotel)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(towel, be at hotel)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(towel, be at hotel)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(towel, be at hotel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(towel, be at motel)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(towel, be at hotel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(towel, be at hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(towel, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)