townhouse: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.62
, property
Weight: 0.61
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, home
Weight: 0.54
, apartment
Weight: 0.54
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.37
, condominium
Weight: 0.36
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.35
, duplex
Weight: 0.35
, house
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00
be at florida 0.85
be at chicago 0.82
be at urbon america 0.81
be at washington 0.80
be at new mexico 0.78
be at apartment build in wilmington delaware 0.78
be at hawaii 0.78
be at milwaukee 0.77
be expensive in boston 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in boston)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(apartment, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(apartment, be at apartment build in wilmington delaware)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(apartment, be at michigan)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(home, be at michigan)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(apartment, be at apartment build in wilmington delaware)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in boston)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(home, be at michigan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be at michigan)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be at apartment build in wilmington delaware)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in boston)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at florida)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at chicago)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(condominium, be at washington)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at hawaii)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(condo, be at milwaukee)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(home, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(apartment, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in boston)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(apartment, be at apartment build in wilmington delaware)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(condominium, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(condominium, be at michigan)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(condominium, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(condominium, be at florida)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(condo, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(condo, be at chicago)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(condominium, be at washington)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(condominium, be at washington)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(condo, be at milwaukee)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(condo, be at milwaukee)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(condo, be at hawaii)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(condo, be at hawaii)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(townhouse, be at michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(townhouse, be at urbon america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(townhouse, be at urbon america)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at urbon america)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(townhouse, be at urbon america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(apartment, be at michigan)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(home, be at michigan)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(apartment, be at apartment build in wilmington delaware)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in boston)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condominium, be at michigan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(condominium, be at florida)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(condo, be at chicago)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(condominium, be at washington)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(condo, be at milwaukee)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(condo, be at hawaii)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(apartment, be at michigan)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(home, be at michigan)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in boston)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(townhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(apartment, be at apartment build in wilmington delaware)