toyota: be cheaper than competition lately

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.64
, car
Weight: 0.61
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mercedes benz
Weight: 0.65
, corolla
Weight: 0.54
, ferrari
Weight: 0.36
, hyundai
Weight: 0.36
, subaru
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than competition lately 1.00
is more expensive 0.80
has quality better 0.78
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(subaru, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ferrari, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hyundai, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(corolla, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(subaru, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(subaru, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(corolla, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(corolla, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(hyundai, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(hyundai, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ferrari, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ferrari, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mercedes benz, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(subaru, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(subaru, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(toyota, is more expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(toyota, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is more expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(toyota, is more expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(toyota, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(toyota, is more expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(toyota, has quality better)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(toyota, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(subaru, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ferrari, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hyundai, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(corolla, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subaru, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mercedes benz, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(toyota, be cheaper than competition lately)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)