toyota: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.64
, car
Weight: 0.61
, vehicle
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mercedes benz
Weight: 0.65
, corolla
Weight: 0.54
, ferrari
Weight: 0.36
, hyundai
Weight: 0.36
, subaru
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
has quality good 0.76
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(toyota, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mercedes benz, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ferrari, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(subaru, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(subaru, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ferrari, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(toyota, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ferrari, is best)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ferrari, is best)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(subaru, is best)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(subaru, is best)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mercedes benz, is best)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mercedes benz, is best)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ferrari, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ferrari, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(subaru, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(subaru, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(subaru, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(subaru, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(toyota, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(toyota, has quality better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(toyota, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(toyota, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ferrari, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(subaru, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ferrari, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mercedes benz, is best)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(subaru, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(subaru, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(toyota, is best)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)