track: has quality changes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents driver
Weight: 0.58
, evidence
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.58
Siblings know
Weight: 0.63
, heart
Weight: 0.62
, cross country
Weight: 0.61
, road
Weight: 0.61
, bullet train
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality changes 1.00
has quality good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(track, has quality changes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(track, has quality changes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evidence, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(evidence, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cross country, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(heart, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(track, has quality changes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(track, has quality changes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(heart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(heart, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cross country, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cross country, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(track, has quality changes)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(track, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(track, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(track, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality changes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(track, has quality changes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(heart, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cross country, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(track, has quality changes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)