trade: was important in 1400

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deal
Weight: 0.65
, change
Weight: 0.59
, tax
Weight: 0.59
, scheme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings auto mechanic
Weight: 0.63
, blacksmith
Weight: 0.61
, plumbing
Weight: 0.61
, welding
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in mesopotamia 1.00
was important in 1400 1.00
was important to sumerian city-states 0.99
was crucial to songhai 0.86
was difficult for phoenicians 0.84
was important to queen amina 0.77
is needed 0.76
be important to community 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(tax, is needed)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trade, was important in 1400)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tax, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tax, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(welding, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(tax, is needed)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(trade, was important in 1400)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(welding, is needed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(welding, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(trade, was important in 1400)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(trade, was important in mesopotamia)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trade, was important to sumerian city-states)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(trade, was important in mesopotamia)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(trade, was important in mesopotamia)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(trade, was important to sumerian city-states)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in 1400)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(trade, was important in 1400)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tax, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(welding, is needed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(trade, was important in 1400)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tax, is needed)