tax: is needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.75
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, income
Weight: 0.64
, rate
Weight: 0.62
, inheritance
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
is needed 1.00
be necessary at all 0.79
need paid 0.78
need limited 0.76
be supposed work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(policy, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tax, is needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(policy, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(income, be supposed work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(policy, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tax, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(income, be supposed work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(income, be supposed work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(tax, is needed)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tax, need paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tax, need limited)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(tax, need limited)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tax, need limited)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tax, need paid)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tax, is needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(tax, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(policy, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(income, be supposed work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(tax, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(policy, is needed)