tax: need paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.75
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, income
Weight: 0.64
, rate
Weight: 0.62
, inheritance
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
need paid 1.00
have paid 0.95
is paid 0.94
be paid to government 0.87
pay 0.85
be paid employed 0.83
get paid in america 0.82
was paid in egypt used 0.78
be paid on investments 0.78
be deducted from pay 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(income tax, is paid)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(income tax, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tax, need paid)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tax, pay)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tax, be paid to government)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tax, is paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tax, is paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tax, have paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tax, have paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tax, have paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(tax, be paid to government)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tax, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tax, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tax, have paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tax, pay)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tax, pay)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tax, get paid in america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tax, pay)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tax, be paid to government)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tax, get paid in america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tax, get paid in america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tax, be paid to government)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tax, get paid in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tax, need paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tax, need paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tax, need paid)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)