:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tax, need paid)
Similarity expansion
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tax, pay)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tax, is paid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tax, is paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tax, have paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tax, have paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tax, have paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tax, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tax, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tax, have paid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tax, pay)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tax, pay)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tax, pay)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tax, need paid)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tax, need paid)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)