tax: have paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.75
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, income
Weight: 0.64
, rate
Weight: 0.62
, inheritance
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
have paid 1.00
is paid 0.98
need paid 0.95
be paid to government 0.89
pay 0.87
be paid employed 0.86
get paid in america 0.82
be deducted from pay 0.80
were paid in empire 0.80
was paid in egypt used 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(income tax, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(income tax, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tax, have paid)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tax, is paid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tax, be paid to government)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tax, pay)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tax, need paid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tax, is paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(tax, be paid to government)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tax, get paid in america)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tax, pay)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tax, is paid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tax, pay)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tax, pay)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tax, is paid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tax, need paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(tax, need paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tax, be paid to government)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tax, get paid in america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tax, need paid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tax, get paid in america)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tax, be paid to government)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tax, get paid in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tax, have paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tax, have paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tax, have paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)