:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tax, pay)
Similarity expansion
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tax, is paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tax, have paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tax, need paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tax, get paid in america)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tax, is paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tax, have paid)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tax, is paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tax, have paid)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tax, have paid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tax, need paid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tax, is paid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(tax, need paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tax, get paid in america)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tax, need paid)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tax, pay)
Typical implies Plausible
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tax, pay)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tax, pay)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)