tax: be deducted from salary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.63
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.75
, surcharge
Weight: 0.66
, income
Weight: 0.64
, rate
Weight: 0.62
, inheritance
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be deducted from salary 1.00
be deducted from pay 0.93
is deducted 0.91
be deducted at source 0.88
be deducted in california 0.82
be deducted in california for coop 0.79
pay 0.76
is paid 0.76
have paid 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is deducted)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(income tax, is deducted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(income tax, is deducted)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(income tax, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(income tax, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tax, be deducted from salary)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(tax, pay)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tax, be deducted from pay)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tax, pay)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tax, have paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tax, is paid)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(tax, pay)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(tax, is paid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tax, have paid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tax, is paid)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tax, have paid)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tax, is paid)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tax, have paid)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(tax, pay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tax, be deducted from salary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(tax, be deducted from salary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(income tax, is deducted)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tax, be deducted from salary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(income tax, is paid)