train tracks: have gaps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
have gaps 1.00
have gaps in them 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(train tracks, have gaps)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(train tracks, have gaps)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(train tracks, have gaps)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(train tracks, have gaps in them)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(train tracks, have gaps)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(train tracks, have gaps in them)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(train tracks, have gaps)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(train tracks, have gaps in them)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(train tracks, have gaps)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(train tracks, have gaps in them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(train tracks, have gaps)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(train tracks, have gaps)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(train tracks, have gaps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(train tracks, have gaps)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(train tracks, have gaps)