tramp: be related to juliet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.60
, film
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.55
, life
Weight: 0.50
, woman
Weight: 0.49
Siblings lady
Weight: 0.60
, elf
Weight: 0.33
, prostitute
Weight: 0.33
, avenger
Weight: 0.33
, clown
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to juliet 1.00
be related to romeo 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lady, be related to juliet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lady, be related to romeo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lady, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(lady, be related to juliet)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lady, be related to romeo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(lady, be related to romeo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tramp, be related to juliet)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(tramp, be related to romeo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tramp, be related to romeo)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tramp, be related to romeo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to romeo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to juliet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tramp, be related to juliet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lady, be related to juliet)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to juliet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(lady, be related to romeo)