tramp: be related to romeo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.60
, film
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.55
, life
Weight: 0.50
, woman
Weight: 0.49
Siblings lady
Weight: 0.60
, elf
Weight: 0.33
, prostitute
Weight: 0.33
, avenger
Weight: 0.33
, clown
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to romeo 1.00
be related to juliet 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lady, be related to romeo)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lady, be related to juliet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lady, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(lady, be related to romeo)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lady, be related to juliet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(lady, be related to juliet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(tramp, be related to romeo)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tramp, be related to juliet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tramp, be related to juliet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tramp, be related to juliet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to juliet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to romeo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tramp, be related to romeo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(lady, be related to romeo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tramp, be related to romeo)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lady, be related to juliet)