trash container: be at fast food restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.57
Siblings garbage
Weight: 0.35
, jar
Weight: 0.33
, suitcase
Weight: 0.32
, crate
Weight: 0.32
, bucket
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast food restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.90
has food 0.83
be at area behind restaurant 0.82
be at grocery store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(jar, has food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(jar, be at grocery store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(jar, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(jar, be at grocery store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(jar, has food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(jar, has food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(trash container, be at fast food restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(trash container, be at restaurant)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at restaurant)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(trash container, be at restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(trash container, be at restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash container, be at area behind restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at fast food restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(trash container, be at fast food restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(jar, has food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(trash container, be at fast food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(jar, be at grocery store)