trash: be at hotel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trash can
Weight: 0.75
, container
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.55
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.37
, garbage can
Weight: 0.37
, garbage
Weight: 0.36
, litter
Weight: 0.34
, waste
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hotel 1.00
be at motel 0.84
be at restaurant 0.80
be at airport 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(trash can, be at motel)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trash, be at hotel)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash can, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trash, be at hotel)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trash, be at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(trash can, be at airport)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trash, be at hotel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at hotel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at airport)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at motel)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at hotel)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at motel)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at airport)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(litter, be at airport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(trash can, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(trash can, be at motel)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(trash can, be at airport)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trash, be at hotel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(litter, be at airport)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(litter, be at airport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(trash, be at hotel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trash, be at hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at hotel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(trash can, be at motel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(trash can, be at airport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(litter, be at airport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at hotel)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(trash can, be at motel)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(trash can, be at airport)