trash: be harmful to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trash can
Weight: 0.75
, container
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, job
Weight: 0.55
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.37
, garbage can
Weight: 0.37
, garbage
Weight: 0.36
, garbage man
Weight: 0.35
, recycling
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to environment 1.00
affect environment 0.88
be harmful to animals 0.87
be problem for environment 0.82
be harmful to marine animals 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(recycling, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(garbage, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(trash, be harmful to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trash, affect environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash, affect environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to marine animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(trash, be harmful to marine animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(trash, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(trash, be harmful to animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(trash, be problem for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to marine animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(trash, be harmful to animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(trash, be problem for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to marine animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to animals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(trash, be problem for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(trash, be problem for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(trash, be harmful to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, affect environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trash, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)