travel agent: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.75
, travel
Weight: 0.71
, specialist
Weight: 0.63
, business
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cruise
Weight: 0.58
, aaa
Weight: 0.52
, travel agency
Weight: 0.39
, biological agent
Weight: 0.39
, air travel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
is cheaper 0.86
be cheaper than airlines 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(specialist, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(travel agent, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(specialist, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(specialist, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cruise, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cruise, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(air travel, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(specialist, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cruise, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cruise, is more expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cruise, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cruise, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(air travel, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(air travel, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(travel agent, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(travel agent, is expensive)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(travel agent, is expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(travel agent, is expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(travel agent, is cheaper)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(travel agent, is cheaper)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(travel agent, is cheaper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is cheaper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, be cheaper than airlines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(travel agent, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(specialist, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cruise, is more expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cruise, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(air travel, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(travel agent, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(specialist, is expensive)