tree frog: have babies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, amphibian
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have babies 1.00
have babys 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have babies)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have babies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(rabbit, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rabbit, have babies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(lizard, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lizard, have babies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(tree frog, have babies)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babys)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tree frog, have babys)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(tree frog, have babys)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tree frog, have babys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tree frog, have babies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lizard, have babies)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rabbit, have babies)