tree frog: have babys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, amphibian
Weight: 0.77
, animal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.40
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have babys 1.00
have babies 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have babies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have babies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(rabbit, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rabbit, have babies)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(lizard, have babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lizard, have babies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(tree frog, have babys)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(tree frog, have babies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(tree frog, have babies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tree frog, have babies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tree frog, have babys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lizard, have babies)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, have babys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(rabbit, have babies)