:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(tree, be fell)
Similarity expansion
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, fall down)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tree, fall)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be fall)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tree, fall over)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, fall over)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(tree, fall)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(tree, fall down)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tree, be fall)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tree, fall)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(tree, be fall)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tree, fall over)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tree, fall)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tree, fall down)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tree, fall over)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tree, fall down)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tree, be fall)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(tree, be fell)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tree, be fell)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings