tree: be fall

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77
, ficus
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fall 1.00
fall 1.00
be at fall 0.99
fall over 0.91
fall down 0.90
has fall down in forest 0.79
be at spring 0.78
be fell 0.78
drop leave 0.77
be at summer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at fall)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at spring)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at summer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(apple tree, be at fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at fall)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(apple tree, be at spring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at spring)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(apple tree, be at summer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at summer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(tree, be fall)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(tree, fall)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tree, fall)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, fall over)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(tree, fall)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(tree, fall down)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tree, be fall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(tree, be fall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at fall)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at spring)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tree, be fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at summer)