tree: has fall down in forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77
, ficus
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
has fall down in forest 1.00
be at in forest 0.89
be find in forest 0.87
be at forest 0.87
be a part of forest 0.86
fall down 0.86
be cut down for their wood 0.82
be find in group call forest 0.82
fall over 0.81
be at fall 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tree, has fall down in forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at fall)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(apple tree, be at fall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at fall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tree, has fall down in forest)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tree, be find in forest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tree, fall down)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(tree, be a part of forest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(tree, fall down)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tree, be a part of forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tree, fall over)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, fall over)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(tree, fall over)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(tree, be find in forest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(tree, be at in forest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(tree, be a part of forest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, fall down)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tree, fall over)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tree, fall down)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tree, has fall down in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at fall)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tree, has fall down in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)