tree: be at in forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77
, ficus
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in forest 1.00
be at forest 0.99
be a part of forest 0.97
be find in forest 0.96
has fall down in forest 0.89
be at tropical forest 0.88
be find in group call forest 0.88
be at rainforest 0.82
be at tropical rainforest 0.79
be at it natural habitat 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at it natural habitat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apple tree, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at it natural habitat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(tree, be at in forest)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tree, be find in forest)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(tree, be a part of forest)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tree, be a part of forest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tree, be at rainforest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(tree, be find in forest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(tree, be a part of forest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at rainforest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(tree, be at rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(tree, has fall down in forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tree, be find in group call forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tree, be at rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at it natural habitat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tree, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)