ficus: be at it natural habitat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.72
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, shrub
Weight: 0.46
, variety
Weight: 0.37
, member
Weight: 0.28
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.38
, apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, maple tree
Weight: 0.38
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at it natural habitat 1.00
be at rainforest 0.77
be find in forest 0.77
be at tropical forest 0.77
be a part of forest 0.77
be a part of ecosystem 0.77
be at in forest 0.77
be at tropical rainforest 0.77
be used to bird nest 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(plant, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(plant, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tree, be a part of forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be at rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tree, be find in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tree, be at rainforest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(tree, be a part of forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tree, be at in forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(plant, be find in forest)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(plant, be a part of ecosystem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plant, be find in forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at rainforest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plant, be a part of ecosystem)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at in forest)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(tree, be find in forest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tree, be a part of forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at it natural habitat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(plant, be a part of ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(plant, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be at rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(tree, be find in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(tree, be a part of forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tree, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apple tree, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at it natural habitat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(ficus, be at it natural habitat)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ficus, be at rainforest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ficus, be at tropical rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(plant, be a part of ecosystem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plant, be find in forest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tree, be at rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at it natural habitat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(plant, be a part of ecosystem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, be at in forest)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tree, be a part of forest)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tree, be find in forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(plant, be find in forest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ficus, be at it natural habitat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tree, be at rainforest)