tree: drip water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, chestnut tree
Weight: 0.79
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
drip water 1.00
get water 0.79
suck up water 0.79
spit water 0.77
need water 0.77
be sprayed with water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(christmas tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, drip water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(christmas tree, need water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(christmas tree, need water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(christmas tree, need water)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tree, drip water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(tree, drip water)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(tree, spit water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tree, spit water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tree, suck up water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tree, spit water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tree, suck up water)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tree, drip water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tree, drip water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(christmas tree, need water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tree, drip water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(christmas tree, need water)