tree: shade picnic table

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents christmas tree
Weight: 0.81
, berry
Weight: 0.63
, vegetation
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cherry tree
Weight: 0.86
, apple tree
Weight: 0.80
, maple tree
Weight: 0.77
, oak tree
Weight: 0.77
, ficus
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
shade picnic table 1.00
shade lawn 0.85
shade traveller 0.85
shade house 0.84
be used to shade 0.84
shade meadow 0.84
shade flower bed 0.83
shade house from sun 0.82
shade grass 0.82
shade car 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, shade lawn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(oak tree, shade lawn)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(oak tree, shade lawn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tree, shade picnic table)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tree, be used to shade)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tree, shade flower bed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tree, shade car)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tree, shade flower bed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(tree, shade grass)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tree, shade car)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(tree, shade grass)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tree, shade grass)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(tree, be used to shade)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tree, shade car)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(tree, shade flower bed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tree, shade car)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tree, shade grass)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tree, be used to shade)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tree, shade flower bed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tree, be used to shade)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tree, shade picnic table)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tree, shade picnic table)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tree, shade picnic table)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(oak tree, shade lawn)