tuberculosis: be considered reemerging virus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pathogen
Weight: 0.73
, illness
Weight: 0.72
, disease
Weight: 0.66
, organism
Weight: 0.65
, infection
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, malaria
Weight: 0.38
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.38
, measles
Weight: 0.38
, influenza
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered reemerging virus 1.00
has state virus 0.83
is re emerging disease 0.79
be considered disease 0.79
be considered re-emerging disease 0.79
be considered infectious disease 0.78
be considered re-emerging infectious disease 0.78
is infectious disease 0.76
is important infectious disease 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state virus)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(malaria, be considered disease)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(measles, is infectious disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(malaria, be considered disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(malaria, be considered disease)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(influenza, has state virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state virus)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(measles, is infectious disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(measles, is infectious disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, is re emerging disease)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, has state virus)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, is re emerging disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, has state virus)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, is infectious disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, has state virus)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, is re emerging disease)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, has state virus)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, is infectious disease)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, is infectious disease)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tuberculosis, is important infectious disease)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, is re emerging disease)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, is important infectious disease)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, be considered re-emerging infectious disease)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, is infectious disease)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, is important infectious disease)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, is important infectious disease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(measles, is infectious disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(malaria, be considered disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, be considered reemerging virus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(influenza, has state virus)