tuna: be high in mercury

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.59
Siblings halibut
Weight: 0.38
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.38
, mackerel
Weight: 0.37
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.37
, marlin
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in mercury 1.00
have high mercury 1.00
have mercury 0.97
have high levels of mercury 0.96
have high mercury levels 0.96
have less mercury 0.95
be full of mercury 0.95
have levels of mercury 0.95
have mercury levels 0.95
have high mercury content 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, be high in mercury)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, have mercury)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(mackerel, have mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mackerel, have mercury)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(mackerel, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mackerel, be high in mercury)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(tuna, be high in mercury)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tuna, have mercury)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(tuna, have mercury)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tuna, have less mercury)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tuna, have less mercury)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(tuna, have less mercury)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be high in mercury)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tuna, be high in mercury)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mackerel, have mercury)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mackerel, be high in mercury)