tuna: have high mercury levels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.59
Siblings halibut
Weight: 0.38
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.38
, mackerel
Weight: 0.37
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.37
, marlin
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high levels of mercury 1.00
have high mercury levels 1.00
have levels of mercury 0.99
have mercury levels 0.99
have high mercury 0.96
be high in mercury 0.96
have mercury 0.93
have high mercury content 0.92
have less mercury 0.92
be full of mercury 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, be high in mercury)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(mackerel, have mercury)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(mackerel, have mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mackerel, have mercury)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(mackerel, be high in mercury) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mackerel, be high in mercury)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tuna, have high mercury levels)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tuna, have high levels of mercury)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(tuna, have high levels of mercury)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(tuna, be high in mercury)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tuna, have mercury)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(tuna, have high levels of mercury)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tuna, have high mercury levels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tuna, have high mercury levels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mackerel, have mercury)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tuna, have high mercury levels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mackerel, be high in mercury)