tuna: is fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.59
Siblings halibut
Weight: 0.38
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.38
, mackerel
Weight: 0.37
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.37
, marlin
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fish 1.00
be different from fish 0.93
be called tuna fish 0.93
be different from other fish 0.88
taste like fish 0.88
is canned fish 0.86
be called tuna 0.83
be more expensive than salmon 0.83
become canned tuna 0.79
be bad for aquaculture 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(halibut, be more expensive than salmon)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(marlin, is fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(marlin, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(marlin, is fish)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(halibut, be more expensive than salmon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(halibut, be more expensive than salmon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(tuna, is fish)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is canned fish)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(tuna, is canned fish)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tuna, is canned fish)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be more expensive than salmon)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be different from fish)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be called tuna fish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tuna, taste like fish)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tuna, be called tuna)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(tuna, be different from fish)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tuna, be more expensive than salmon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be bad for aquaculture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(tuna, be more expensive than salmon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tuna, be called tuna fish)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be called tuna)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tuna, is canned fish)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(tuna, be bad for aquaculture)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tuna, be different from fish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(tuna, be called tuna)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tuna, be different from other fish)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(tuna, be bad for aquaculture)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tuna, be called tuna fish)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tuna, be different from fish)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tuna, be more expensive than salmon)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(tuna, be called tuna)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(tuna, be called tuna fish)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tuna, be different from other fish)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tuna, taste like fish)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tuna, be bad for aquaculture)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tuna, taste like fish)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tuna, taste like fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tuna, is fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(marlin, is fish)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(halibut, be more expensive than salmon)