tundra: be located in arctic

Related concepts

Parents	biome Weight: 0.62 , habitat Weight: 0.54 , landscape Weight: 0.49 , vehicle Weight: 0.48 , ecosystem Weight: 0.48
Siblings	grassland Weight: 0.33 , coral reef Weight: 0.33 , marsh Weight: 0.32 , wetland Weight: 0.32 , moss Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be located in arctic	1.00
be different from polar tundra	0.81
is located	0.80
be different from tundra	0.77
remain frigid zone	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(biome, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(tundra, be located in arctic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(biome, is located)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(biome, is located)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(grassland, is located)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(wetland, is located)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(marsh, is located)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(biome, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(marsh, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(marsh, is located)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(wetland, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(wetland, is located)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(grassland, is located) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(grassland, is located)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(tundra, be located in arctic)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(tundra, is located)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(tundra, remain frigid zone)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(tundra, remain frigid zone)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(tundra, remain frigid zone)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(tundra, is located)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(tundra, remain frigid zone)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(tundra, is located)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(tundra, be different from tundra)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(tundra, be different from polar tundra)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be different from polar tundra)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(tundra, be different from tundra)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(tundra, be different from polar tundra)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be different from tundra)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(tundra, is located)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(tundra, be different from polar tundra)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(tundra, be different from tundra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(tundra, be located in arctic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(biome, is located)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(marsh, is located)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(wetland, is located)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(grassland, is located)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(tundra, be located in arctic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(biome, is located)