tundra: be different from tundra

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from tundra 1.00
be different from polar tundra 0.95
be different from alpine tundra 0.90
be different from taiga 0.83
have permafrost 0.77
be located in arctic 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tundra, be different from tundra)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tundra, be different from polar tundra)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(tundra, be different from alpine tundra)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tundra, be different from polar tundra)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be different from polar tundra)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tundra, be different from polar tundra)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(tundra, be different from taiga)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, have permafrost)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tundra, be different from alpine tundra)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be different from alpine tundra)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(tundra, be located in arctic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(tundra, have permafrost)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(tundra, have permafrost)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tundra, be different from alpine tundra)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be located in arctic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tundra, be located in arctic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tundra, be different from taiga)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tundra, be different from taiga)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be different from taiga)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(tundra, be located in arctic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have permafrost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be different from tundra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(tundra, be different from tundra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tundra, be different from tundra)