tunnel: be built under large bodies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.67
, route
Weight: 0.64
, structure
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61
Siblings underground
Weight: 0.55
, bridge
Weight: 0.35
, rail
Weight: 0.34
, stadium
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be built under large bodies 1.00
be built under large bodies of water 0.98
be built under bodies 0.97
be built under bodies of water 0.95
be built in water 0.81
were built 0.80
be built over water 0.80
be over water built 0.80
be built under rivers 0.79
be built in deep water 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bridge, were built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(stadium, were built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be built in water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be built over water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(bridge, be built in water)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bridge, be built in water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(bridge, be built over water)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bridge, be built over water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bridge, were built)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(bridge, were built)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(stadium, were built)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(stadium, were built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built under bodies)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built under bodies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under bodies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built under bodies of water)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under bodies of water)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built under bodies of water)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under bodies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built under rivers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under bodies of water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built under rivers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under rivers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under rivers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bridge, be built in water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bridge, be built over water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bridge, were built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(stadium, were built)