twilight: is bad literature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.59
, franchise
Weight: 0.59
, tv show
Weight: 0.59
, series
Weight: 0.58
Siblings twilight zone
Weight: 0.35
, dusk
Weight: 0.33
, dawn
Weight: 0.33
, sunrise
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad literature 1.00
is bad book 0.81
is good book 0.78
is book good 0.78
is bad writing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(twilight, is bad literature)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad book)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(twilight, is bad book)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(twilight, is bad book)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(twilight, is bad writing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(twilight, is bad writing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(twilight, is bad book)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is good book)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(twilight, is bad writing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(twilight, is good book)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(twilight, is good book)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(twilight, is good book)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad literature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(twilight, is bad literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(twilight, is bad literature)