twilight: is bad writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.59
, franchise
Weight: 0.59
, tv show
Weight: 0.59
, series
Weight: 0.58
Siblings twilight zone
Weight: 0.35
, dusk
Weight: 0.33
, dawn
Weight: 0.33
, sunrise
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad writing 1.00
is bad book 0.80
was written 0.79
is bad literature 0.78
is good book 0.76
is book good 0.76
is bad love story 0.76
is poorly written 0.75
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(franchise, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(twilight, is bad writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(franchise, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(franchise, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dawn, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(franchise, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(twilight, is bad writing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dawn, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(dawn, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(twilight, is bad writing)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad book)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(twilight, is bad book)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(twilight, is bad book)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad literature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(twilight, is bad literature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(twilight, is bad literature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad love story)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(twilight, is bad love story)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(twilight, is bad love story)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(twilight, is poorly written)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(twilight, is poorly written)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is poorly written)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(twilight, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(twilight, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(twilight, is bad book)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(twilight, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(twilight, is bad literature)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is good book)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(twilight, is poorly written)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(twilight, was written)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(twilight, is bad love story)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(twilight, was written)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(twilight, was written)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(twilight, is good book)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(twilight, was written)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(twilight, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(twilight, is good book)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(twilight, is good book)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(twilight, is bad writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(franchise, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dawn, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(twilight, is bad writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(franchise, has quality bad)