typhus: were more common in cities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disease
Weight: 0.56
, illness
Weight: 0.53
, infection
Weight: 0.49
, louse
Weight: 0.47
, sickness
Weight: 0.45
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.35
, typhoid fever
Weight: 0.34
, bubonic plague
Weight: 0.34
, pneumonia
Weight: 0.33
, gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were more common in cities 1.00
were more common in past 0.87
is more common 0.86
were such threat in cities 0.85
is more common now 0.85
become more common 0.83
be more common than than adults 0.83
be more common in individuals 0.83
be common in hospitals 0.82
be more common in winter 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(illness, be more common in winter)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sickness, be more common in winter)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(infection, be common in hospitals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(louse, be more common than than adults)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, become more common)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(illness, become more common)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(louse, be more common than than adults)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(infection, be common in hospitals)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sickness, be more common in winter)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(illness, be more common in winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(illness, become more common)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sickness, be more common in winter)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(illness, be more common in winter)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(infection, be common in hospitals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louse, be more common than than adults)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be common in hospitals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be more common in winter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(infection, be common in hospitals)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(illness, be more common in winter)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(illness, become more common)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sickness, be more common in winter)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(louse, be more common than than adults)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, become more common)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(pneumonia, be common in hospitals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pneumonia, be common in hospitals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pneumonia, be more common in winter)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pneumonia, be more common in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(typhus, were more common in cities)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in past)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(typhus, were more common in past)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in past)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(louse, be more common than than adults)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(illness, become more common)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(infection, be common in hospitals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sickness, be more common in winter)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(illness, be more common in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lyme disease, become more common)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pneumonia, be common in hospitals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pneumonia, be more common in winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(louse, be more common than than adults)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(illness, become more common)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(infection, be common in hospitals)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sickness, be more common in winter)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(illness, be more common in winter)