typhus: were more common in past

Related concepts

Parents	disease Weight: 0.56 , illness Weight: 0.53 , infection Weight: 0.49 , louse Weight: 0.47 , sickness Weight: 0.45
Siblings	lyme disease Weight: 0.35 , typhoid fever Weight: 0.34 , bubonic plague Weight: 0.34 , pneumonia Weight: 0.33 , gastroenteritis Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were more common in past	1.00
is more common	0.89
is more common now	0.89
were more common in cities	0.87
become more common	0.86
be more common in winter	0.85
be more common than than adults	0.84
be more common in individuals	0.84
is common now	0.84
was common	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(illness, be more common in winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in past)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(sickness, be more common in winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in past)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(louse, be more common than than adults) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in past)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(illness, become more common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in past)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(illness, become more common)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(louse, be more common than than adults)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(sickness, be more common in winter)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(illness, be more common in winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(sickness, be more common in winter)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(illness, be more common in winter)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(illness, become more common)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(louse, be more common than than adults)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(pneumonia, be more common in winter)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(illness, be more common in winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in past)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(sickness, be more common in winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in past)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(illness, become more common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in past)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(louse, be more common than than adults) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in past)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(lyme disease, become more common)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(pneumonia, be more common in winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(pneumonia, be more common in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(typhus, were more common in past)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(typhus, were more common in cities)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(typhus, were more common in cities)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in cities)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in cities)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(typhus, was common)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(typhus, was common)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(typhus, was common)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(typhus, was common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(typhus, were more common in past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(louse, be more common than than adults)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(illness, become more common)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(sickness, be more common in winter)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(illness, be more common in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(lyme disease, become more common)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(pneumonia, be more common in winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(illness, become more common)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(louse, be more common than than adults)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(sickness, be more common in winter)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(typhus, were more common in past) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(illness, be more common in winter)